设施瓠瓜品种比较试验  

Comparison Test Between Seven Facilities Cultivated Varieties of Lagenaria siceraria var. hispida

作　　者：邹宜静[1] 李鲁峰 颜韶兵 黄凯美[1] 汪继华[3] 李楚羚 丁力[3] 

机构地区：[1]杭州市种子总站,浙江杭州310020 [2]杭州市萧山区农业科学研究所,浙江萧山311201 [3]杭州市良种引进公司,浙江杭州310020

出　　处：《黑龙江农业科学》2015年第4期67-69,共3页Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences

摘　　要：为了筛选出适合杭州地区设施栽培的中棒形瓠瓜品种,以越蒲1号、越蒲2号、浙蒲8号、102、南国1号、超级早生和杭蒲1号为试材,在大棚设施栽培条件下,比较评价了7个品种的生育期、植物学性状、商品性和产量等指标。结果表明:浙蒲8号瓜皮油绿,瓜条上下粗细均匀,商品性好,适合在杭州地区推广种植;越蒲1号瓜皮淡绿,瓜型短粗,目前不适应杭州市场的消费习惯,但产量高,可作为外销储备品种。杭蒲1号、南国1号和越蒲2号瓜纵径均在40cm左右,属长棒形品种。超级早生瓜纵径低于25cm,且产量低,这4个品种目前不建议在杭州地区推广。In order to select suitable varieties of Lagenaria siceraria var.hispidafor Hangzhou area,taking seven different varieties of Lagenaria siceraria var.hispida as materials,including Yuepu 1,Yuepu 2,Zhepu 8,102,Nanguo 1,Chaojizaosheng and Hangpu 1,the growth period,botany properties,commodity and yield were investigated.The results showed that Zhepu 8was suitable,because of its great shelf quality,while Yuepu 1could not meet the demands of consumers in Hangzhou.But Yuepu 1still could be a reserve variety for exporting with its high yields.Melon longitudinal diameter of Hangpu 1,Nanguo 1and Yuepu 2was around 40 cm,that of Chaojizaosheng was less than 25 cm,and its yield was less,the four varieties were not recommended currently in Hangzhou area.

关 键 词：瓠瓜 生育期 植物学性状 产量 

分 类 号：S642.9[农业科学—蔬菜学]