检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:南京市秦淮区人民检察院课题组 李爱君 朱赫[1] 李建明[3]
机构地区:[1]南京市秦淮区人民检察院,江苏南京210001 [2]南京市人民政府 [3]南京师范大学
出 处:《时代法学》2015年第2期90-107,共18页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:对财产刑执行检察监督是检察机关法律监督职能的应有之义。然我国现有的法律体系虽已对财产刑执行检察监督给予一定的关注,但这些规定还很难满足实践的需要。检察机关在财产刑执行中介入监督被动、监督方式单一、监督效力缺乏强制性等问题既有对非监禁刑缺乏足够重视的意识层面的因素,也有法律制度规定不完善、配套机制不健全的原因。要完善财产刑执行检察监督,需要从多个层面予以改进。The supervision of execution of property punishment is one of the functions of people's procuratorate legal supervision, having important significance and value. Although the existing legal system has attached due importance to prosecutorial supervision of property punishment, such attention is insufficient to meet the needs of practice. During execution of property punishment, procuratorate is passive to intervene, also the mode of supervision is solitary and the effectiveness of supervision is non- mandatory. Many factors lead to this, such as lack of attention to non-imprisonment, inadequate of the legislation and supporting mechanism deficiencies. To perfect the supervision, it should make im- provements in several aspects.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222