检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周亮[1] 王勇[1] 王锦凤[1] 肖露[1] 张春晖[1] 侯震晖[1] 钱卫平[1]
机构地区:[1]北京大学深圳医院生殖医学科,深圳518036
出 处:《生殖与避孕》2015年第3期196-200,共5页Reproduction and Contraception
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(项目批准号:30900817);深圳市科技计划项目(项目批准号:201302069;JCYJ201206 18;ZYC201006180435A)
摘 要:目的:探讨短时授精对IVF受精正常患者体外受精-胚胎移植(IVF-ET)治疗结局的影响。方法:回顾性分析IVF受精率>60%患者的临床资料,按授精方案分为短时授精组(n=153)和常规受精组(n=180)。结果:IVF短时授精组和常规IVF组分别获卵1 619枚和1 986枚,分别有133名和152名患者接受了新鲜胚胎移植。组间女方年龄、基础FSH(b FSH)、b LH、b E2、Gn量、h CG注射日FSH水平、h CG注射日E2水平、h CG注射日LH水平、获卵数、卵子成熟度及移植日内膜厚度均无统计学差异。IVF短时授精组和常规IVF组的正常受精率(65.55%vs 67.84%)、正常卵裂率(98.02%vs 96.90%)、胚胎种植率(29.41%vs 27.84%)、临床妊娠率(44.36%vs 45.39%)、继续妊娠率(41.35%vs 42.76%)、流产率(5.45%vs 2.90%)和异位妊娠率(1.82%vs 2.90%)均无统计学差异,但是短时授精组的多原核受精率(14.56%)显著高于常规IVF组(6.19%),而短时授精组的优质胚胎率(33.51%)高于常规IVF组(28.99%)。结论:因IVF短时授精可避免常规IVF完全受精失败而逐渐在国内广泛应用,但其远期影响还有待进一步认识。Objective: To investigate the clinical significance of short co-incubation of gametes in patients with no barriers to fertilization during IVF-ET. Methods: IVF patients with fertilization rate 〉60% were collected in the study and divided into short co-incubations group (n=153) and traditional IVF group (n=180). The parameters and clinical outcomes had been analyzed between above two groups. Results: The patients in short co-incubation group and traditional IVF group received 1 619 eggs and 1 986 eggs, and 133 patients and 152 patients accepted embryo-transfer in fresh cycles, respectively. There were no significant differences between the two groups in ages, basal FSH/LH/E_2 level, FSH/LH/E_2 level on hCG injection day, total dosage of Gn used, numbers of oocytes retrieved, maturation of oocyte and endometrial thickness in ET day. The rates of normal fertilization (65.55% vs 67.84%), cleavage (98.02% vs 96.90%), implantation (29.41% vs 27.84%), clinical pregnancy (44.36% vs 45.39%), ongoing pregnancy (41.35% vs 42.76%), abortion (5.45% vs 2.90%) and ectopic pregnancy (1.82% vs 2.90%) between the two groups were not significantly different. However, polyspermy rate was significantly higher in short co-incubation group (14.56%) than in traditional IVF group (6.19%), and short co-incubation group (33.51%) had more good-quality embryos than traditional IVF group (28.99%). Conclusion: Short co-incubation of gametes combined with early rescue ICSI had been used widely for avoiding complete fertilization failure in traditional IVF. Long-term effects and indications of short co-incubation followed by early removal of granular cells should be further recognized and standardized.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28