检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:孙淑华[1]
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2015年第8期179-180,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的通过病案分析不同麻醉方法对剖宫产患者的影响。方法选择40例行剖宫产术的患者,随机分为两组。选择麻醉深度与术中知晓情况为观察指标,在各时间点与麻醉诱导前的基础值各时间点对比分析。结果麻醉诱导后,静吸组比全凭组BIS值低。术后,全凭组有1例术中知晓。结论静吸复合麻醉比全凭静脉麻醉控制麻醉深度效果更佳。Objective To analyze the effect of different methods of anesthesia for cesarean patients through medical records of 40 patients. Methods40 patients cesarean section were randomly divided into two groups. Choose the depth of anesthesia and intraoperative awareness outcome measures case , on the basis of the value of each point of time before the induction of anesthesia at each time point analyzed.Results After induction of anesthesia , lower than the inhalation group depends on the group BIS values. After surgery, there is one case depends on group intraoperative awareness. Conclusion The depth of anesthesia inhalation anesthesia better than total intravenous anesthesia control.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43