“阿尔都塞国家机器理论”视角下的苏报案  

Subao Case From the Perspective of "ISAs Theory"

作　　者：贾艳敏[1] 朱进[1] 

机构地区：[1]安徽大学历史系,合肥230039

出　　处：《北京工业大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期37-41,70,共6页Journal of Beijing University of Technology (Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：苏报案中章太炎、邹容分别被轻判的结果折射出晚清国家综合控制能力的薄弱。造成这一结果的原因有多方面。一方面,由于近代租界的特殊性加之行政系统运行效率低下,致使清政府镇压性国家机器在苏报案中难以发挥"暴力机关"的作用;另一方面,由于意识形态国家机器的相对独立性、多样性,造成清政府与革命派在报刊舆论、法庭辩驳等意识形态领域呈现相互较量之势,也在一定程度上影响了最终的判罚结果。In Subao case,Zhang Taiyan and Zou Rong were sentenced to 3 and 2 years＇ imprisonment respectively.Such result reflects the weakness of the national comprehensive control capability of the late Qing Dynasty.The reasons for this are manifold.On the one hand,due to the particularity of the modern concession and the low operational efficiency of the administrative system,it is difficult for the state mandatory machine of the Qing government to play the role of ＂violence authority＂ in Subao case.On the other hand,the ideological state apparatus are relatively independent and diverse.This makes the Qing government and the revolutionaries seem to compete with each other in the ideological field such as newspaper and court argue,which,to some extent,also affects the final outcome of penalty.

关 键 词：苏报案 意识形态国家机器理论 国家控制力 

分 类 号：K257.9[历史地理—历史学]