检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:顾强荣[1] 王黎明[1] 蒋纯志[1] 孙强[1] 梁斌[1] 黄河[1] 宋华荣[1]
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属南京医院 南京市第一医院骨科,江苏省210006
出 处:《江苏医药》2015年第6期650-652,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
基 金:南京市医学科技发展项目(YKK11113)
摘 要:目的研究闭合复位股骨近端防旋髓内钉(PFNA)内固定和人工股骨头置换术(FHR)治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床疗效。方法将87例老年股骨粗隆间骨折患者分为闭合复位PFNA内固定治疗组(A组,46例)和FHR治疗组(B组,41例),记录两组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量、住院天数及Harris髋关节评分的变化。结果 87例患者随访12-28个月。与B组相比,A组手术时间、术中出血量、术后引流量和住院天数减少(P<0.01);而两组Harris髋关节评分无统计学差异(P>0.05)。结论 PFNA内固定在治疗老年股骨粗隆间骨折的临床效果优于FHR的治疗效果。Objective To investigate the clinical efficacy of proximal femoral nail anti-rotation(PFNA)internal fixation and femoral head replacement(FHR)in the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures in the elderly.Methods A total of 87 elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures was randomized into two groups of A(treated by PFNA internal fixation,46cases)and B(treated by FHR,41cases).The operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage,hospital stay and Harris hip score were compared between two groups.Results Eighty-seven patients were followed up for 12 to 18 months.Compared with group B,the operative time,intraoperative blood loss,postoperative drainage and hospital stay were decreased in group A(P〈0.01).However,there was no significant difference in Harris hip score between groups of A and B(P〉0.05).Conclusion Internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures with PFNA in the elderly achieves a better result than FHR.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229