基于文献计量的期刊分区与论文学术评价量化实证研究  

Empirical Research on the Quantify of Journal Zones and Paper Academic Evaluation Based on Bibliometrics

作　　者：李秋实[1] 刘红玉[2] 

机构地区：[1]天津工业大学数字化图书馆研究中心 [2]天津工业大学图书馆

出　　处：《图书馆工作与研究》2015年第4期60-66,共7页Library Work and Study

基　　金：天津市艺术科学研究规划项目"基于量化学术评价的天津艺术科学重点学科竞争力研究"(项目编号:C12022)研究成果之一

摘　　要：文章按照中科院JCR期刊分区,对生物学、膜、复合材料、纺织4个小类各个分区的论文和论文被引情况进行统计分析,对生物学与生物化学学科的ESI高被引论文在各区的分布情况进行统计分析。研究发现,被引次数超过一区篇均被引次数的论文中,非一区论文为一区论文的2-4倍,在ESI百分之一的高被引论文中非一区论文达到58.4%,在万分之一的高被引论文中非一区论文也达到45%。研究结果表明,"以刊论文"在逻辑上不自洽,该学术评价方法缺乏基本的理论支撑。According to the JCR zones of Chinese Academy of Science, the article counts up and analyses the papers and cited papers from every journal zone of four disciplines for biology, membrane, composite and textile science, as well as the scatter of ESI high cited papers for biology and bio chemistry in each journal zone. It finds that the number of papers in non the first zone are two to four times large than that of the papers in the first zone, among the average paper numbers cited more than a zone. The papers of non-the first zone reach to 58.4% in the ESI high cited papers of 1 %, the papers of non the first zone reach to 45% in the ESI high cited papers of 0. 01%. The result shows that the evaluation of papers by journals is not logically self-consistent, and the academic evaluation method is lack of basic theoretical support.

关 键 词：实证研究 文献计量 学术评价 JCR ESI 

分 类 号：G644.4[文化科学—高等教育学]