机构地区:[1]宁波大学医学院附属宁波市第六医院脊柱外科,315040
出 处:《中华创伤杂志》2015年第4期360-365,共6页Chinese Journal of Trauma
摘 要:目的测试Ⅱ型齿状突骨折、I型Hangman骨折及C2~3椎间盘损伤对C1~C2节段和C2~C3节段稳定性的影响并探讨其临床意义。方法新鲜成人完整C1~C3标本10具,男5具,女5具;年龄25—45岁,平均35.7岁。在生物力学试验机上依次按照对照组(正常状态)、I型Hangman骨折组、Ⅱ型齿状突骨折组、I型Hangman骨折+Ⅱ型齿状突骨折组、I型Hangman骨折+Ⅱ型齿状突骨折+C2~3椎间盘损伤组顺序测试C1~C2及C2~C3节段的三维运动范围(ROM)及中性区(NZ),对结果进行统计学分析。结果I型Hangman骨折组与对照组比较,ROMC1-C2在各方向上差异均无统计学意义,且ROMC2-C3的左/右侧屈两个方向上差异亦无统计学意义;Ⅱ型齿状突骨折组与对照组比较,ROMC2-C3在各方向上差异均无统计学意义,且ROMC1-C2的左/右旋转两个方向上差异亦无统计学意义;I型Hangman骨折+Ⅱ型齿状突骨折组和对照组比较,ROMC1-C2值只在左/右旋转方向上以及ROMC2-C3值只在后伸方向上差异无统计学意义。I型Hangman骨折+Ⅱ型齿状突骨折+C:~。椎间盘损伤组与对照组比较,ROM。,~。值在侧屈和前屈后伸方向上以及ROM。。值在各方向上差异均有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论I型Hangman骨折丧失了C2~C3节段在左/右旋转和前屈后伸方向的稳定性,Ⅱ型齿状突骨折丧失了C1-C2节段在左/右侧屈和前屈后伸方向上的稳定性;I型Hangman骨折伴Ⅱ型齿状突骨折联合C2-3,椎间盘损伤丧失了除寰枢关节旋转功能外C1-C3节段所有方向的稳定性。本研究可为相关内固定技术的研究和临床治疗提供生物力学依据。Objective To evaluate the effect of type Ⅱ odontoid fracture, type I Hangman frac- ture, C2-C3 disc injury on stability of C1 -C2 and C2-C3 segments and investigate the clinical significance. Methods Ten fresh-frozen eadaverie cervical specimens (5 men and 5 women; 25 -45 years of age, mean 35.7 years) were selected to test the stability of Cl-C2 and C2-C3 segments in the settings of intact condition (control group) , type I Hangman fracture, type II odontoid fracture, type I Hangman fracture + type Ⅱ odontoid fracture, type I Hangman fracture + type I1 odontoid fracture + C2-C3 disc injury. Range of motion (ROM) and neutral zone (NZ) of those segments were measured. Results Compared with the intact condition, type I Hangman fracture produced no significant variations in C1 -C2 ROM in all load- ing modes and C2-C3 ROM during left and right lateral bending; type Ⅱ odontoid fracture produced no significant variations in Cz-C3 ROM in all loading modes and CI-C2 ROM during left and right rotation; type I Hangman fracture + type Ⅱ odontoid fracture revealed no significant variations in C1-C2 ROM dur-ing left and right rotation and C2-C3 ROM during extention; type 1 Hangman fracture + type Ⅱ odontoid fi'acture + C2-C3 disc injury produced no significant variations in CI -C2 ROM dr,ring left and right lateral bending and exlension-flextion anti C2-C3 ROM in all loading modes (P 〈0.05). Conclusions Type I Hangman fracture can reserve C1-C2 segmental left and right rotation and extension-flextiun; type Ⅱ odontoid fracture can reserve C1-C2 segmental left and right lateral bending and extension-flextion; type I Hangman fracture + type Ⅱ odontoid fracture + C2-C3 disc injury can reverse atlantoaxial rotationary stability and C1-C3 segmental stability in all directions. This study provides the biomechanical basis for clinical Ireatments and the related researches of internal fixation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...