红外线扫温枪在老年科的应用  

Application of infrared scanning temperature gun in geriatrics department

作　　者：张丽[1] 冯颖洁[2] 范素梅[1] 杨素花[1] 

机构地区：[1]徐州医学院附属淮安医院老年科,223002 [2]徐州医学院附属淮安医院医保科,223002

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第7期853-855,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的：探讨红外线扫温枪在老年科的应用。方法选择2013年1—12月的老年患者200例,分别采用水银体温计测腋温（对照组）和红外线扫温枪测腋部、额部、颈部、内关体温（研究组）,比较两组患者测量体温时间与终末消毒时间,5种方法测温效果,患者与护士对红外线测温仪测额部、颈部及内关部位测量使用的认可情况。结果研究组患者测量体温时间与终末消毒时间分别为（0.1±0.0）与（0.5±0.0）min,短于对照组,差异有统计学意义（t值分别为20.61,49.71；P〈0.01）。红外线扫温枪测额温与水银体温计测腋温差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）,而红外线腋温、颈温和内关温测量与水银体温计测腋温差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。患者与护士对红外线测温仪测颈部及内关部位较认可。结论红外线扫温枪测颈温和内关体温与水银体温计具有同样的稳定性和准确性。Objective To explore the effect of infrared scanning temperature gun in geriatrics department. Methods A total of 200 cases of elderly patients were divided into control group with mercury thermometer （ armpit） and the test group with infrared scanning temperature gun （ armpit,mild forehead, neck, neiguan） . The time of measuring temperature and sterilization, and the effects on measuring temperature were compared. Results The time of measuring temperature and sterilization in the test group were （0. 1 ± 0. 0） and （0. 5 ± 0. 0 ） min, which were significantly shorter than those of the control group （ t = 20. 61, 49. 71, respectively;P〈0. 01）. There was a significant difference in the forehead temperature measured by infrared scanning temperature gun and the armpit temperature measured by mercury thermometer （P〈0. 05）. However, there was no significant difference in the armpit, neck and neiguan temperature measured by infrared scanning temperature gun and the armpit temperature measured by mercury thermometer （P〉0. 05）. Patients and nurses were more likely to the neck and neiguan measuring by infrared scanning temperature gun. Conclusions The stability and accuracy of infrared scanning temperature gun measuring neck and neiguan is same as the mercury thermometer.

关 键 词：温度计 体温 老年人 红外线扫温枪 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]