检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:屈建华[1] 谭捷[1] 冯小兵[1] 吴常杰[1] 赵新动 李英祥[1] 闫帮楷[1]
机构地区:[1]新疆生产建设兵团第六师奇台医院骨科,新疆奇台县831800
出 处:《中华实用诊断与治疗杂志》2015年第4期361-363,共3页Journal of Chinese Practical Diagnosis and Therapy
基 金:新疆生产建设兵团第六师科技攻关课题(20110531)
摘 要:目的探讨保留与切除残迹的前交叉韧带(anterior cruciate ligament,ACL)重建手术方法及疗效。方法 43例单侧ACL断裂患者,依据关节镜ACL重建术中是否切除ACL残迹分为保留组21例和切除组22例。记录2组术前及术后6个月双股部周径差值、关节活动度、Lysholm评分、术后国际膝关节文献委员会膝关节评估表(International Knee Documentation Committee,IKDC)评分,比较2组膝关节功能改善情况。结果术前保留组双股部周径差值((2.01±0.91)cm)、关节活动度((127.89±21.12)°)、Lysholm评分((57.12±8.91)分)与切除组((2.12±0.54)cm、(125.78±20.91)°、(56.98±9.12)分)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);术后6个月,保留组双股部周径差值((0.89±0.94)cm)与切除组((1.01±0.51)cm)比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),关节活动度((149.78±6.91)°)、Lysholm评分((98.42±3.12)分)与切除组((142.89±11.12)°,(91.12±2.91)分)比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);术后保留组IKDC综合评级优良率(71.42%)高于切除组(59.09%)(P<0.05)。结论与关节镜下切除ACL残迹的ACL重建手术相比,术中保留ACL残迹更利于患者术后膝关节稳定和功能恢复。Objective To compare the methods and surgical outcome of remnant preservation vs remnant resection in anterior cruciate ligament(ACL)reconstruction.Methods Forty-three patients with ACL rupture were divided into remnant preservation group(n=21)and remnant resection group(n=22).The bi-femoral perimeter difference,range of joint motion,Lysholm score and postoperative International Knee Documentation Committee(IKDC)Knee Evaluation Form score were recorded before and 6 months after operation and the knee joint function improvement was compared between two groups.Results The bi-femoral perimeter difference,range of joint motion and Lysholm score showed no significant differences between remnant preservation group((2.01±0.91)cm,(127.89±21.12)°,57.12±8.91)and remnant resection group((2.12±0.54)cm,(125.78±20.91)°,56.98±9.12)(P〉0.05)before operation.The bi-femoral perimeter difference showed no significant difference between remnant preservation group((0.89±0.94)cm)and remnant resection group(1.01±0.51)cm)(P〉0.05),and there were significant differences in the range of joint motion and Lysholm score in remnant preservation group((149.78±6.91)°,98.42±3.12)and remnant resection group((142.89±11.12)°,91.12±2.91)6 months after operation(P〈0.05).IKDC excellent rate was higher in remnant preservation group(71.42%)than that in remnant resection group(59.09%)(P 0.05).Conclusion Remnant preservation can achieve a better outcome for maintaining stability of knee joint and improving knee joint function than remnant resection in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.145.208.57