制度变迁过程中的碎片化:以户籍制度改革为例  

Fragmentation in Institutional Change: a Case Study on China's Reform of the Registered Permanent Residence System

作　　者：王清[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学中国公共管理研究中心,政治与公共事务管理学院

出　　处：《学术研究》2015年第4期55-61,159,共7页Academic Research

基　　金：国家哲学社会科学基金青年项目"我国城市户籍制度改革的不同路径比较分析研究"(11CZZ040);2012年度国家社科基金重大项目"扩大公民有序政治参与:战略;路径与对策研究"(12&ZD040)的阶段性成果;"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助";中山大学"985"三期资助

摘　　要：制度变迁碎片化是对已有的权威主义碎片化、政府碎片化和政策碎片化三个理论的提升,用以描述制度变迁中变迁主体权威分立、变迁主体权力结构分散、变迁工具(地方性政策)分割甚至冲突的现象。在此基础上,本文进一步通过C市户籍制度改革的个案分析制度变迁碎片化的组织基础及部门互动策略。人口管理部门(即公安部门)采取借力策略,社会服务部门(如教育局)采取应付策略,综合协调部门(如城乡统筹委)采用扩权策略,三个政府部门之间讨价还价、互相冲突加剧了制度变迁碎片化的程度。制度变迁碎片化有深刻的组织基础,该理论是分析中国改革的一种视角。Based on the three types of fragmentation theory involving fragmented authoritarianism, fragmented govern-ment and fragmented policy, fragmentation exists usually in the process of institutional change. Fiscal and ad-ministrative decentralization give an account of fragmented institutional change. The case study is based on the reform of Chinese household registration system. The Public Security Bureau wanted to promote a reform of the registered permanent residence system to clarify the information of floating population, while the Bureau of Ed-ucation strongly opposed the reform. Therefore, the Public Security Bureau has tried to bring pressure from the government as well as the public to adapt to the reform. At the same time the Bureau of Education implements selectively the reform. And as a coordinator, the Urban and Rural Planning Bureau has tried to extend its pow-er, which leads to a severe fragmentation in the reform.

关 键 词：制 度变迁 户籍制度 碎片化 行政性分权 

分 类 号：D63-3[政治法律—政治学]