强脉冲光与点阵Er∶YAG激光治疗面部毛孔粗大的临床疗效比较  

Intense Pulsed Light with Automatic-Pulse Technology and Ablated Fractionated Er:YAG Laser in treating Enlarge Facial Pores:an Observation and Comparison

作　　者：张元文[1] 尹红[2] 徐军[3] 王白石[3] 刘秀峰[1] 潘文东[1] 

机构地区：[1]解放军第59医院烧伤整形外科,开远市661600 [2]成都军区昆明疗养院体疗室 [3]解放军总医院整形修复科

出　　处：《中国激光医学杂志》2015年第2期90-94,共5页Chinese Journal of Laser Medicine & Surgery

摘　　要：目的比较强脉冲光自动脉冲技术(Automatic-Pulse Technology,APT)与点阵式Er∶YAG激光治疗面部毛孔粗大的疗效及安全性。方法面部毛孔粗大患者72例,随机分为两组,APT组和激光组,每组患者36例。APT组,强脉冲光自动脉冲技术治疗;激光组,采用点阵式Er∶YAG激光。术后随访3个月,应用面部毛孔标准照片评价法进行临床疗效评估,并比较两组患者的疗效。结果治疗后3个月,APT组和激光组患者面部毛孔标准照片评分为(2.61±0.99)和(2.00±1.2),两组比较差异具有显著意义(P<0.05)。APT组与点阵Er∶YAG激光组的满意度分别为77.8%和91.7%,点阵Er∶YAG激光组疗效优于APT组,组间疗效差异有显著意义(P<0.05)。结论 APT与点阵式Er∶YAG激光均能有效改善面部毛孔粗大,APT虽疗效不及点阵式Er∶YAG激光,但治疗相对更安全,恢复更快。两者都是较理想的治疗方法,可根据患者具体情况进行选择。Objective To observe and compare the clinic efficacy and operation safety between the intense pulsed light with automatic-pulse technology（APT） and ablated fractionated Er ∶ YAG laser in treating enlarged facial pores.Methods Totally 72 patients of enlarged facial pores were divided into two groups randomly： 36 patients were treated with APT,the rest 36 patients with ablated fractionated Er ∶ YAG laser.During the follow-up conducted 3 months after the treatment,the clinical improvement was evaluated by grading the widening of pores with photographic scales.Meanwhile,the adverse reaction was assessed.Results After the treatment,the difference between two groups in improvement of the appearances of facial pores was significant（P 0.05）.The patients＇ satisfaction rate of the APT group was 77.8% vs 91.7% in fractionated Er ∶ YAG laser group.The two groups also differed dramatically（P 0.05） in clinic efficacy.Conclusions Both APT and Ablative Fractionated Er ∶ YAG laser are effective to shrink enlarged facial pores with minimal side effects.

关 键 词：激光 强脉冲光 自动脉冲技术 局灶性光热作用技术 毛孔粗大 

分 类 号：R454.2[医药卫生—治疗学] R622[医药卫生—临床医学]