检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南省长沙市中心医院放射科,湖南长沙410004 [2]湖南省衡阳市南华大学,湖南衡阳421001
出 处:《中国CT和MRI杂志》2015年第5期94-96,共3页Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
摘 要:目的通过对多排螺旋CT(multislice spiral computed tomography,MSCT)与结肠镜对肠结核的诊断对比研究,评价MSCT及结肠镜对肠结核的诊断价值。方法回顾性的分析本院27例经手术或病理诊断为肠结核的患者的腹部MSCT及结肠镜检查结果,比较二者对肠结核的诊断准确率。结果经手术或病理诊断为肠结核的27例患者中,MSCT准确诊断26例(96.3%),结肠镜准确诊断23例(85.2%)。二者对肠结核的诊断准确率无明显差异(P>0.05)。结论 MSCT结合结肠镜能够有效的提高肠结核的诊断率,有利于指导临床治疗。Objective The purpose of this study is to explore the diagnostic accuracy of the intestinal tuberculosis using MSCT and colonoscope.Methods 27 patients with intestinal tuberculosis were enrolled in the study and who have undergone MSCT and colonoscope. The point of the study is to analysis the diagnostic accuracy of the intestinal tuberculosis among the methods of MSCT and colonoscope.Results In all the patients, 26 cases (96.3%) were diagnosed intestinal tuberculosis by using MSCT, 23 cases (85.2%) were diagnosed intestinal tuberculosis by using colonoscope. There are no significant differences between MSCT and colonoscope (P〉0.05).Conclusion MSCT and colonoscope could significantly improve the diagnostic accuracy of intestinal tuberculosis. Therefore, MSCT and colonoscope may play a crucial role for diagnosing intestinal tuberculosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145