检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床医学》2015年第4期38-39,共2页Clinical Medicine
基 金:河南省科技攻关计划项目(112102310642)
摘 要:目的探讨腹部加压法对于提高经直肠前列腺结节超声弹性成像稳定性的临床应用价值。方法分别在常规和腹部加压两种情况下,用超声弹性成像技术对77个前列腺结节进行评分,得出弹性变化率比值SR和SR1,结合病理结果,计算两种情况下的敏感度、特异度、准确度、阳性预测值和阴性预测值。结果腹部加压情况下所得特异度(92.4%)、准确度(87.4%)高于常规方法(88.5%、84.4%)。结论腹部加压方式时经直肠前列腺超声弹性成像技术所得参数结果更为稳定客观。Objective To assess the clinical application value of abdominal pressure method on transrectal ultrasound elastography examination of prostate nodule. Methods SR and SR1 were produced after examined prostate nodules using transrectal ultrasound elastography technique with conventional method and abdominal pressure method,and the sensitivity,specificity,accuracy,positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated according to the examination results. Results The specificity and accuracy with abdominal pressure method were 92. 4% and 87. 4%,which were significantly higher than 88. 5%and 84. 4% of the conventional groups( P〈0. 05). Whilst,the differences between the sensitivities of the two groups were not significant( P〈0. 05). Conclusion Abdominal pressure method have high stability and reliability when conducting transrectal ultrasound elastography examination of prostate nodules.
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33