检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《临床心身疾病杂志》2015年第2期110-111,共2页Journal of Clinical Psychosomatic Diseases
摘 要:目的:探讨司法精神医学鉴定案例的临床特征。方法对130例司法精神病鉴定资料进行回顾性分析。结果本组鉴定诊断排前3位的依次为精神分裂症(19.2%)、精神发育迟滞(15.4%)、颅脑外伤所致精神障碍(13.9%);进行刑事责任能力评定者占70.8%,其中评定为完全责任能力占32.6%,限制责任能力占29.4%,无责任能力占38.0%。结论司法精神病鉴定案例中以刑事责任能力评定案例居多,鉴定诊断以精神分裂症为首位。Objective To explore the clinical features of forensic psychiatric ex‐pertise cases .Methods Data of 130 forensic psychiatric expertise cases were ret‐rospectively analyzed .Results The first 3 expertise diagnoses was in turn schizo‐phrenia (19 .2% ) , mental retardation (15 .4% ) and mental disorders due to craniocerebral trauma (13 .9% );clients w ho undergoing criminal responsibility expertise made up 70 .8% , of them ones with fully responsibility did 32 .6% ,ones with limited responsibility did 29 .4% and ones without responsibility did 38 .0% .Conclusion Most of forensic psychiatric expertise cases are to deter‐mine criminal responsibility ,schizophrenia occupies first place of expertise diagnosis .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235