检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:徐静[1]
机构地区:[1]南京森林警察学院警务管理系
出 处:《江苏警官学院学报》2015年第1期41-48,共8页Journal of Jiangsu Police Institute
基 金:中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金项目资助;项目编号:RWYB201411
摘 要:能动司法的兴起,既与中国特色社会主义法律体系的形成紧密相关,也与法治中国道路的不断探索密切相联;既因为法院文化建设逐步受到重视为能动司法的深入实践提供了法文化软实力的支持,也由于传统中国司法文化的现代价值为能动司法的形成与实践提供了历时性的法律资源。可以说,是这些复杂而综合性的法治因素和法治力量共同作用下,催生了一种相对独立自主的司法模式。当下中国的司法改革,既要重视这些法治因素,也要充分尊重、培育和利用这些法治因素。唯有此,才能顺利的推进司法的自主型改革与发展。The rise of judicial activism is not only closely related with the formation of socialist legal system with Chinese characteristics, but also with the continuous exploration into modern China ruled of law.Besides, the cultural development of court is gradually given attention, which provides a cultural soft power support for further practice of activist justice. Furthermore, the modern value of traditional China judicial culture has provided diachronic resources for the formation and practice of judicial activism. It can be said that the joint action of legal factors and forces with complexity and comprehensiveness has given rise to a relatively independent judicial mode. The present China's judicial reform should not only pay attention to,but respect and utilize these factors and forces. Thus, the judicial reform will advance towards an independent one.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80