检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马育霞[1] 刘毅 王鹏升[1] 李英[1] 赵红英[1] 王文浩[1] 刘云峰[1]
机构地区:[1]河北省沧州市中心医院干部病房,061001 [2]河北省沧州监狱医院内科
出 处:《中国煤炭工业医学杂志》2015年第3期381-383,共3页Chinese Journal of Coal Industry Medicine
基 金:沧州市科学技术研究与发展指导计划项目(编号:1213056ZD)
摘 要:目的探讨急诊疑似急性肺动脉栓塞(APE)诊断中Wells评分应用价值。方法回顾性分析该院近期收治急诊疑似APE患者76例临床资料,依据Wells评分分为低度、中度及高度可疑组,比较Wells评分单用及与D-二聚体检测联用于不同组APE发病率和诊断假阳性率。结果三组患者APE发病率和诊断假阳性率比较差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);低度可疑组患者二种方法联用于APE诊断假阳性率显著低于Wells评分单用(P<0.05)。结论 Wells评分用于急诊疑似APE诊断具有操作简便,预测准确度高等优势,而联合D-二聚体检测有助于降低诊断假阳性率。Objective To investigate clinical application value investigation of Wells scores on diagnosis of suspected acute APE in emergency. Methods Clinical data of 76 patients with suspected acute APE in emergency were retrospectively analyzed and divided into 3 group including low degree suspected group, me dium degree suspected group and high degree suspected group according to Wells scores; and the incidence rate of APE and false positive rate of diagnosis in different groups by Wells score used alone and combined with Ddimer detection were compared. Results There were significant differences in incidence rate of APE and false positive rate of diagnosis among 3 groups(P〈0.05). The false positive rate of diagnosis in low degree suspected group by two method combined diagnosis was significantly lower than Wells score used alone(P〈0.05). Conclusion Wells scores on diagnosis of suspected acute APE in emergency have advantages including simple operation and high prediction accuracy; Wells scores combined with D- dimer detection on diagnosis of suspected acute APE is helpful to lower false positive rate of diagnosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249