检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]安徽中医药大学,安徽合肥230038 [2]安徽中医药大学第一附属医院儿科,安徽合肥230031
出 处:《中医药临床杂志》2015年第3期380-382,共3页Clinical Journal of Traditional Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:观察推揉掐扣四法为主治疗小儿痰热咳嗽(急性气管-支气管炎)的临床疗效。方法:将符合纳入标准的66例痰热型咳嗽患儿随机分成2组,治疗组33例采用推揉掐扣四法为主的推拿疗法,对照组33例采用中成药(小儿麻甘颗粒)治疗。2个疗程(10d)后观察2组临床疗效、症候积分及肺部听诊的比较情况。结果:治疗后2组有效率、证候积分及肺部听诊恢复正常所用时间比较均有统计学差异。结论:推揉掐扣四法为主治疗小儿痰热咳嗽不仅能提高临床疗效,且可缩短肺部听诊恢复正常所用时间,可进一步推广应用。Objective:To observe the clinical efficacy of the four methods(pushing, kneading, fingernail pressing, percussing)for the treatment of phlegm cough(acute trachea-bronchitis)in children.Method:66 cough patients with phlegmheat were randomly divided into 2 groups, treatment group(33 cases)used the four methods(pushing, kneading, fingernail pressing, perussing),while control group(33 cases)were treated by Chinese patent medicine(Xiaoer Magan keli). After 2 courses(10 days), observe and compare the clinical efficacy, symptom score and lung auscultation.Results:After treatment, the comparison between the two groups was statistically significant(P〈0.05) in the total effective rate, syndrome integral, and the time used to return to normal lung auscultation.Conclusion:The method can be used widely. Because the four methods can not only improve the clinical curative effect, but also shorten the time used to return to normal lung auscultation.
分 类 号:R244.1[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28