警惕控方的话语垄断——论犯罪论体系的变革  

Alert to Speaking Monopoly of the Prosecutor:Reformation of the Constitution of Crime

作　　者：孙丽[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]山东财经大学法学院,山东济南250014 [2]南京师范大学法学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《武汉理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期274-280,共7页Journal of Wuhan University of Technology:Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目(12BFX055);教育部人文社会科学青年基金项目(10YJC820044);江苏省普通高校研究生科研创新计划资助项目(CXLX13-325)

摘　　要：犯罪论体系不仅是法官定罪的工具,更是控、辩、审三方在刑事司法过程中共同使用的话语工具。相比于国外的犯罪论体系而言,我国的犯罪构成四要件理论赋予被告人(辩方)的"话语权"较控方明显薄弱,从而形成了控方的"话语垄断"。因此,要回应刑事司法实践的需求,消解控方的话语垄断。犯罪论体系的变革必须考虑犯罪论体系的"去政治化",重视被告人(辩方)的需求,赋予其更充分的"话语工具",切实保障被告人(辩方)的合法权利尤其是辩护权利。The constitution of crime is not only a foundation for the judge＇s conviction,but also the word tool for the prosecutor and the defender in the criminal justice practices.The constitution of crime in China gives more ＂speaking right＂to the prosecutor than the defender,which has caused＂word monopoly＂of the prosecutor.To respond to the demands of the criminal justice practices,＂word monopoly＂of the prosecutor must be eliminated.The reformation of the constitution of crime should be directed towards＂depoliticization＂,which indicates that more word tools should be given to the defender and the legal rights of the defender should be actually guaranteed.

关 键 词：话语权 犯罪论体系 话语垄断 辩护权 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]