博看、读览天下和龙源社科期刊比较分析  

A Comparative Analysis on Social Sciences Periodical Nets Exemplified by Bokan, Dooland and Longyuan

作　　者：孙静[1] 陈泳成[1] 

机构地区：[1]北京理工大学珠海学院,广东珠海519000

出　　处：《科教文汇》2015年第12期163-164,共2页Journal of Science and Education

摘　　要：文章从收录情况、检索功能、界面和基本功能比较四个方面对三大人文社科期刊数据库龙源期刊网、博看网和读览天下进行了分析比较,为图书馆在选择订购与利用这三大数据库提供参考,也为数据库的改进和完善为用户的利用提供参考。This paper made a comparison and analysis among three major humanities and social sciences periodical databases, Longyuan, Bokan and Dooland, from the situations of their col-lection, retrieval function, interfaces and basic functions, aiming to provide references for libraries in selecting and purchasing databases, as well as for the databases themselves in improving themselves and users in using them.

关 键 词：人文社科期刊数据库 龙源期刊网 博看网 读览天下 信息服务 

分 类 号：G237.5[文化科学]