头面部急诊外伤伤口使用医用胶黏合的临床效果观察  被引量:9

Study on the Clinical Effect of Medical Adhesive in Emergency Trauma Wounds on Head and Face

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:李大鹏[1] 

机构地区:[1]北京同仁医院南区急诊外科,北京100176

出  处:《中国医药导刊》2014年第6期1028-1029,共2页Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide

摘  要:目的:观察医用胶(福爱乐医用胶,FAL)对头面部急诊外伤伤口的治疗效果,以期为头面部外伤的急诊医用胶黏合治疗提供更多的理论依据。方法:收集我院2012年1月~2013年1月急诊头面部外伤的患者100例,100例患者随机分为常规治疗对照组(n=50)和医用胶治疗观察组(n=50)。对照两组的临床疗效。结果:对照组和观察组的处理时间分别为(14.6±5.7)min和(13.6±4.2)min,两组之间差异无统计学意义(t=0.54,P〉0.05)。对照组中90.0%甲级愈合,10.0%乙级愈合,观察组中92.0%甲级愈合,8.0%乙级愈合,两组之间无显著性统计学差异(χ2=0.26,P〉0.05)。对照组和观察组的的临床有效率分别为34.0%和88.0%,观察组的临床疗效显著优于对照组(χ2=3.42,P〈0.05)。结论:福爱乐医用胶黏合头面部急诊外伤伤口临床疗效显著。Objective:To investigate the clinic efficacy of FAL medical adhesive in emergency trauma wounds of the head and face and explore its clinic significants.Methods:A total of 100 emergency trauma wounds of the head and face were enrolled in this study.The patients were randomly devided into two groups:nornal treatment control group(n=50) and FAL medical adhesive treatment observation group(n=50).The clinic efficacy was compared between the two groups.Results:The total processing time in control and observation group were(14.6±5.7)min and(13.6±4.2)min,respectively.There was no significant difference between the two groups(t=0.54,P〉0.05).The grade A and B healing was 90.0% and 10.0% in the control group,and 92.0% and 8.0% in observation group.There was no significant difference between the two groups(χ2=0.26,P〉0.05).The clinic efficacy in control and observation group was 34.0% and 88.0%,respectively.Which was higher in observation group than that in control group(χ2=3.42,P〈0.05).Conclusion:FAL medical adhesive showed effectively in treating emergency trauma wounds of the head and face.

关 键 词:福爱乐医用胶 头面部外伤 临床效果 

分 类 号:R641[医药卫生—外科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象