检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴培培[1] 张永明[2] 汪胜[1] 刘文静[1]
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学医学院,310036 [2]杭州师范大学卫生所
出 处:《中国卫生统计》2015年第2期261-263,共3页Chinese Journal of Health Statistics
基 金:教育部人文社会科学研究青年项目(编号:11YJC630196);浙江省"民生调研协作攻关"课题(编号:2011XN02)
摘 要:目的探讨密切值法和秩和比(RSR)法在乡镇卫生院合理用药综合评价中的应用。方法采用多阶段随机抽样方法,对浙江省10个县(市、区)乡镇卫生院门诊处方进行分析,围绕每张处方药品品种数量均数、均次处方金额,以及使用抗生素、激素、注射剂处方的比例等六项指标对合理用药进行了综合评价。结果计算获得10个县(市、区)乡镇卫生院合理用药评价的密切值,并按优劣进行了排序与分档。结论密切值法和RSR法相结合,在乡镇卫生院合理用药综合评价中具有较好的实用性。Objective To explore the application effect of close-value method and RSR method in the comprehensive e- valuation for the rational drugs use in township health centers. Methods By multi-stage random sampling, the outpatient pre- scriptions in township health centers of 10 counties in Zhejiang province were analyzed. The rational drug use was evaluated comprehensively based on the six indicators including the mean of medicine varieties per prescription, the average amount per prescription, the proportion of the prescription of antibiotics, hormones and injection. Results The close-values of the compre- hensive evaluation for the rational drugs in township health centers were calculated on the basis of the data of 10 counties, and were sorted according to advantages and disadvantages. Conclusion The combination of close-value method and RSR method had a good practicability in the comprehensive evaluation for the rational drug use in township health centers.
分 类 号:R197.62[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3