功能性便秘结肠水疗与传统灌肠治疗疗效比较及护理  

Curative efficacy comparison of colon hydrotherapy and traditional enema in functional constipation patients and its nursing

作　　者：赵阿红[1] 史红霞[1] 

机构地区：[1]江苏省泰兴市人民医院消化内科,江苏泰兴225400

出　　处：《实用临床医药杂志》2015年第8期63-65,共3页Journal of Clinical Medicine in Practice

摘　　要：目的分析结肠水疗与传统吊袋灌肠治疗功能性便秘(FC)的效果和疗效持续时间№总结护理体会。方法将65例FC患者随机分为结肠水疗组(34例)和传统灌肠组(31例),前组应用GCJ-K型电脑灌肠机进行水疗,后组使用传统灌肠袋行大量不保留灌肠,并分别辅以相应的护理;观察2组患者便秘改善情况,并运用便秘患者生活质量问卷(PAC-QOL)积分比较,评价治疗效果和疗效持续时间。结果结肠水疗组有效率91.2%,传统灌肠组有效率61.3%,2者差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),观察期间便秘改善的持续时间,结肠水疗组明显长于传统灌肠组(P<0.05),且前者的生活满意度明显高于后者。结论结肠水疗能促进结肠蠕动,调节肠道菌群失调,持久地改善便秘,是一种纯物理自然疗法。Objective To analyze the effect and duration of colon hydrotherapy and the traditional enema in functional constipation（ FC） patients and to summarize the nursing experience.Methods A total of 65 FC patients were randomly divided into colon hydrotherapy group with 34 cases and traditional enema group with 31 cases. The hydrotherapy group received hydrotherapy with GCJ- K type computer enema machine while the traditional enema group received a great deal no-retention enema with tradition enema bag. The two groups received corresponding nursing respectively. The constipation improvement of the two groups was observed and the PAC- QOL was applied to evaluate the treatment effect and duration of efficacy. Results The effective rate was 91. 2% in the colon hydrotherapy group and 61. 3% in the traditional enema group,the difference was statistically significant（ P〈0. 05）. The duration of constipation improvement in the colon hydrotherapy group was obviously longer than that in the traditional enema group（ P〈0. 05）. Besides,the life satisfaction in the colon hydrotherapy group was obviously higher than that in the traditional enema group.Conclusion The colon hydrotherapy can promote the colon peristalsis,adjust the intestinal flora and improve the constipation continuously,so it is natural and physical therapy.

关 键 词：结肠水疗 传统灌肠治疗 功能性便秘 护理 

分 类 号：R473.5[医药卫生—护理学]