订单农业对农户的影响总是有效吗?——买方垄断和非垄断市场订单农业参与效果的对比研究  

Is Contract Farming always Effective? ——A Comparative Study of the Effect of Farmers' Participation in Contract Farming in the Monopsony and Non-monopsony Market

作　　者：董翀[1] 钟真[1] 孔祥智[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学农业与农村发展学院,北京100872

出　　处：《商业经济与管理》2015年第4期16-23,共8页Journal of Business Economics

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"农业现代化体制机制创新与工业化;信息化;城镇化同步发展研究"(13AZD003);国家自然科学基金面上项目"成员异质性;合作社理论创新与农民专业合作社发展政策体系构建"(71273267);国家自然科学基金项目"产业链转型视角下的生鲜乳质量安全保障机制研究"(71203227);国家社科基金青年项目"契约选择视角下的农民专业合作社联合社运行机制研究及政策设计"(13CJY080);教育部高校博士点基金项目:"基于专业合作社的农产品质量安全内生保障机制研究--以奶业为例"(20120004120002)

摘　　要：订单农业作为促进我国现代农业发展和农业价值链转型升级的有效策略,近年来受到广泛的关注和采纳。但其在不同市场条件下对参与农户的影响效果是否一致是一个有争议的问题。文章以山东、山西、宁夏三省非垄断特征市场下千余农户样本和内蒙古自治区H市具有买方垄断特征的生鲜乳市场下的农户样本为例,采用PSM方法分别分析了订单农业对农户农业成本收入和农业服务可得性的影响。结果发现,非垄断市场下订单农业的影响效果显著优于买方垄断市场。As an important and effective strategy to promote modern agriculture development and the upgrading of agriculture value chain,contract farming is becoming popular. However,is the contract farming always effective to farmers even under different conditions of the market？ It is a controversial question. This paper takes the samples from Shandong,Shanxi and Ningxia which are mostly non-monopsony market and samples from Inner Mongolia which is nearly monopsony market. We analyze the effect on agricultural income and cost,and the availability of agricultural services of farmers＇ participation in contract farming under the condition of monopsony and non-monopsony market. We found that the effect of farmers＇ participation in contract farming in non-monopsony market is significantly better than that in monopsony market.

关 键 词：买方垄断 非垄断市场 订单农业 影响效果 

分 类 号：F713[经济管理—产业经济]