《刑法》第13条“但书规定”新论  

Further Research on the Exclusion Clauses of the Article 13 in the Criminal Law

作　　者：刘杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法大学法律学院,上海200042

出　　处：《河南司法警官职业学院学报》2015年第1期55-58,共4页Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College

摘　　要：关于《刑法》第13条的"但书规定"是否具有出罪功能,在理论上众说纷纭。"但书规定"标准过于模糊,司法以其作为出罪事由缺乏可操作的标准,容易造成"同案不同判"。事实上,在法定出罪事由之外,存在超法规犯罪阻却事由。以"但书规定"作为规范依据,通过超法规犯罪阻却事由可以为无处罚必要性的行为提供出罪的具体理论依据,也可破除"出罪标准过粗"的困境。There are various opinions about the proviso of article 13,whether the proviso had the function of decriminalization. The standard of the proviso of article 13 is too vague,it is difficult to be used in justice,and usually lead to ＂different sentences＂. Actually,outside the legal ground for elimination of misfeasance,there is the supra-law ground for elimination of crime. The vagueness of the proviso need supra-law ground for elimination of crime to be constructed,which could also break the plight of ＂the standard is too thick for elimination of crime＂.

关 键 词：但书规定 超法规犯罪阻却事由 情节显著轻微 危害不大 

分 类 号：DF61[政治法律—刑法学]