检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郭彬[1] 王鲁 徐凌忠[1] 胡琼伟[1] 王亨[1]
机构地区:[1]山东大学卫生管理与妇幼卫生学系,济南250012 [2]山东省卫生和计划生育委员会
出 处:《中华医院管理杂志》2015年第5期381-383,共3页Chinese Journal of Hospital Administration
摘 要:目的了解目前山东省各市级卫生行政机构卫生应急能力现状,发现不足,改进工作。方法使用由国家卫生和计划生育委员会组织编制的卫生应急能力调查问卷,对山东省17个市级卫生行政机构应急能力现状进行普查。结果52.94%的机构有卫生应急储备资金,100.00%的机构制定了突发公共卫生事件应急预案,94.12%的机构落实了应急物资实物储备,100.00%的机构组织开展了本级医疗卫生人员的卫生应急全员培训,卫生行政机构突发公共卫生事件网络直报率为100.00%。结论山东省市级卫生行政机构卫生应急能力总体较好,但仍存在不足,突出表现在应急经费投入不足、培训演练效果不明显、物资储备管理制度不健全、卫生应急人员数量不能满足实际工作需要等方面,亟需改进。Objective To learn the emergency response capacity of health authorities at city level in Shandong province in order to discover loopholes and make improvement. Methods The health emergency questionnaire designed by China Health and Family Planning Commission was used for survey of 17 city-level health authorities in Shandong province. Results 52.94% of the health authorities were found with health emergency reserve funding; 100. 00% of them with public health emergency contingency plans; 94. 12% of them having health emergency supplies in kind; 100. 00% of them having health emergency training for all of the staff; 100.00% of them with direct web reporting for public health emergency. Conclusion Such authorities were found with satisfactory health emergency capacity in general. Defects were found with emergency funding shortage, poor training and drilling outcomes, poor material reserves management, and insufficient health emergency personnel.
分 类 号:R197.1[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.189.141.66