检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南京大学经济学院,江苏南京210093 [2]南京大学长江三角洲经济社会发展研究中心,江苏南京210093
出 处:《改革》2015年第4期116-124,共9页Reform
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点项目"以全球价值链引导我国经济结构转型升级"(批准号:11AZD002);江苏省高校哲学社会科学研究重大重点项目"江苏先进制造业与现代服务业互动发展研究"(批准号:2012ZDIXM011)
摘 要:在传统的经济增长理论下,市场有效和资本收益递减规律决定了跨国人均收入的差距只能由国别间的TFP差距所致,且技术差距是导致TFP国别差距的唯一因素。但近期研究表明,资源错配造成的不同国家间全要素生产率的差异是导致跨国人均收入差距的主要原因。市场失灵和政府制度造成的行业内各企业要素投入的边际收益产品的横截面差异,会导致资源配置效率下降,并对产出水平和经济增长率产生影响。随着我国从计划经济向市场经济转型,我国资源配置效率整体上得到了改善,但依然存在较严重的资源错配。所有制歧视、分税制带来的市场分割、户籍制度对劳动力自由流动的阻碍、金融扭曲造成的摩擦是造成国内资源错配和TFP损失的主要原因。Under the traditional theory of economic growth, both effective market and the law of diminishing returns of capital co-decide the difference of income among different countries, and under the assumption, technical gap is the sole element leading to the TFP difference among countries. But recent studies show that maybe resource misallocation has another reason. As market failure and government regulations result in the cross-sectional difference of factors' marginal revenue product among firms. With transition from plan economy to market economy, efficiency of resource allocation in China has been improved on the whole, but still there is a serious misallocation of resources. Ownership discrimination brought by dual-track system, market segmentation brought by tax distribution system, the impediment of labors' free movement from household registration system and financial friction are the major reason to result in China's resource misallocation and TFP loss.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.235