发表在《中华现代护理杂志》的系统评价/Meta分析的质量评价  

An quality evaluation on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published on Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

作　　者：杨芳[1] 吴淑华[1] 

机构地区：[1]海军总医院骨科,北京100048

出　　处：《中华现代护理杂志》2015年第9期1036-1040,共5页Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing

摘　　要：目的：评价发表在《中华现代护理杂志》的系统评价/Meta分析文献的方法学和报告质量。方法利用万方数据库，检索并纳入从《中华现代护理杂志》创刊至2013年12月发表的系统评价/Meta分析文献。由2名研究者独立筛选文献，并采用AMSTAR和PRISMA量表评估文献的方法学质量和报告质量。结果共纳入15篇文献，文献发表数量呈现增多趋势，大部分文献能够根据循证护理的理念和方法实施研究，但仍存在不同程度的问题。方法学质量主要存在纳入和排除研究的文献清单不全、发表情况没有考虑在纳入标准中、不能确定研究选择和数据提取的可重复性、未进行发表偏倚的评估等问题。报告质量的主要不足是研究方法报道不全面、研究结果描述不完善、资金支持描述不清晰等。结论发表在《中华现代护理杂志》的系统评价/Meta分析文献存在一定的质量问题，尚需进一步提高方法学和报告质量。Objective To evaluate the methodological and reporting quality on systematic reviews and meta-analyses published in Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing. Methods All articles of systematic review and Meta-analysis had been collected published on Chinese Journal of Modern Journal from the initial issue to December 2013 in Wanfang Database. Two researchers collected articles independently and utilized AMASTAR scale and PRISMA scale to evaluate the methodology quality and report quality. Results A total of 15 literatures were included in the study, and the number of literature published quantity presented a increasing trend. Most of studies were idea and method of evidence-based research, but some issues still existed. The quality of methodology had problems including incomplete articles checklist of collection and elimination, no consideration inclusion criteria of published situation, uncertain research choice and repeatability of data distilling, and no assessment of published bias. The shortage of report quality contained incomplete report of research method, incomplete description of research result, indistinct description of fund support, etc. Conclusions Systematic reviews and Meta-analyses published on Chinese Journal of Modern Nursing have certain quality flaws, and require to improve the methodological and report quality.

关 键 词：系统评价 META分析 方法学质量 报告质量 

分 类 号：R47[医药卫生—护理学]