加味玉屏风颗粒与西替利嗪治疗慢性湿疹的疗效对比  

Comparison between Jiawei Yupingfeng granule and cetirizine for treating chronic eczema

作　　者：吴盟 李岚岚 

机构地区：[1]荥阳市人民医院,河南荥阳450100

出　　处：《中医临床研究》2015年第4期103-104,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine

摘　　要：目的:对比分析加味玉屏风颗粒与西替利嗪治疗慢性湿疹的疗效与安全性。方法:根据治疗方案将2010年7月-2013年7月我院收治的135例慢性湿疹患者分为观察组与对照组,观察组患者71例,接受加味玉屏风颗粒治疗,对照组患者64例,接受西替利嗪治疗。治疗结束后,所有患者均接受6个月的随访。结果:1两组患者治疗效果相比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。2观察组患者不良反应发生率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。3观察组患者复发率显著低于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:加味玉屏风颗粒与西替利嗪治疗慢性湿疹的疗效相当,但是前者的不良反应发生率与复发率低,值得临床推广应用。Objective：To analyze contradistinction of Jiawei Yupingfeng granule and cetirizine on chronic eczema. Methods：135 patients in our hospital from July 2010 to July 2013 were randomly divided into two group, the observation group （71 cases） was given Jiawei Yupingfeng granule;the control group （64 cases） was given cetirizine. After treatment, all patients were followed up in 6 months. Results： I.Treatment efficacy in two group was compared, the difference was not statistically significant （P〉0.05）. II.The incidence of adverse reactions in the observation was lower, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. III.Recurrence rate in the observation was lower, the difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）. Conclusion： Jiawei Yupingfeng granule and cetirizine showed obvious effects on chronic eczema, but Jiawei Yupingfeng granule was better, and worthy of promotion.

关 键 词：加味玉屏风颗粒 西替利嗪 慢性湿疹 

分 类 号：R758.23[医药卫生—皮肤病学与性病学]