检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李红德[1]
出 处:《中医临床研究》2015年第5期74-75,共2页Clinical Journal Of Chinese Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨并分析中医综合疗法治疗乙肝后肝硬化腹水的临床效果。方法:所选研究对象为我院于2012年2月-2013年11月所收治的100例乙肝后肝硬化腹水病患,基于病患临床资料的分析,采取随机的方式将其划分为对照组与观察组,两组病例各为50例,其中对照组采取西医常规治疗,观察组采取中医综合疗法,疗程为3周,对比分析两组治疗效果。结果:经治疗,观察组治疗总有效率为96.0%,对照组治疗总有效率为82.0%,二者所存差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组病患症状改善时间明显短于对照组,且病患各参数指标改善情况也明显优于对照组,二者所存差异显著,具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:从本次研究的结果来看,在乙肝后硬化腹水的临床治疗中,采用中医综合疗法来予以治疗,所获疗效显著且良好,可使病患临床症状改善时间得到缩短,在临床中值得应用及推广。Objective:To investigate and analyze clinical efficacy of TCM comprehensive therapy on ascites due to cirrhosis after hepatitis B. Methods:100 patients in our hospital were randomly divided into the observation group (50 cases) and the control group (50 cases) from Feb.2012 to Nov.2013. The control group was given conventional western; another was given TCM comprehensive therapy, three weeks as 1 course. Clinical effects in two groups were compared and analyzed. Results: After treatment, the total efficacy in the observation was 96%, obviously higher than 82%in the control;the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Symptoms improving time in the observation was obviously shorter, and improvement of indexes in the observation was better;the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05). Conclusion:TCM comprehensive therapy was confirmed with good efficacy on ascites due to cirrhosis after hepatitis B, it could shorten symptoms improving time, and was worthy of clinical promotion.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229