检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:付加 祁贵生[1,2] 刘有智[1,2] 田建勋[1,2] 郭强[1,2] 董梅英[1,2]
机构地区:[1]中北大学超重力化工过程山西省重点实验室,山西太原030051 [2]山西省超重力化工工程技术研究中心,山西太原030051
出 处:《化学工程》2015年第4期6-10,共5页Chemical Engineering(China)
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(21376229);山西省科技攻关计划(工业)(20130321035-02)
摘 要:开发了2台转子规格相近的逆流与错流旋转填料床,采用平均粒径为2.25μm的粉煤灰模拟细颗粒物,通过实验对比了逆流床与错流床的除尘效率和压降。研究表明:逆流床的除尘效率高于错流床,分别达到98.5%和97.5%。对比研究了转速、液气比、气速对逆流床和错流床除尘效率的影响规律,确定了各自适宜的工艺参数。逆流旋转填料床可以在更小的液气比和转速下达到更高的除尘效率,压降仅比错流床大100 Pa,更适用于工业化推广,应用前景广阔。A pair of countercurrent-flow and cross-flow rotating packed bed (RPB) with the rotors of same size was developed, and the flyash with average particle size of 2.25 p^m was used as simulated dust. Dedusting efficiency and pressure drop of these two RPB were compared by experimentation, and the results show that the dedusting efficiency of countercurrent-flow RPB (98.5%) is higher than that of cross-flow RPB (97.5%). The dedusting efficiency of these two RPB was investigated under different rotating speed, liquid-gas ratio, and gas velocity, and then each of the two appropriate operating conditions was ascertained. The countercurrent-flow RPB has higher efficiency under the conditions of smaller liquid-gas ratio and rotating speed, with its larger than that of cross-flow RPB, which is more suitable for the industrial promotion prospect. pressure drop only 100 Pa and has broad application
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33