检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:丁波[1] 王春[1] 罗书立[1] 衣芳玲[1] 赵海燕[1]
出 处:《临床医学工程》2015年第4期516-517,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的研究循证护理在肾病综合征患儿治疗疗效及生活质量中的干预效果。方法以我院2012年6月至2014年1月收治的100例肾病综合征患儿为研究对象,随机将其分为两组各50例。对照组患儿给予常规护理,观察组患儿在对照组基础上行循证护理干预。比较两组患儿的临床疗效、住院时间及生活质量改善情况。结果观察组的总有效率显著高于对照组(92.0%vs68.0%),住院时间明显短于对照组[(20.3±3.4)vs(27.8±4.9)]d,差异均具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。干预后,两组生活质量评分均显著升高,且观察组评分明显高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论循证护理干预能明显提高NS患儿治疗效果,缩短住院时间,改善其生活质量。Objective To study the intervention effect of evidence-based nursing on efficacy and life quality in children with nephrotic syndrome. Methods 100 children with nephrotic syndrome treated in our hospital from June 2012 to January 2014 were selected and randomly divided into two groups. The control group (50 cases) was given routine nursing, the observation group (50 cases) was given evidence-based nursing intervention on the basis of control group. The clinical effect, hospitalization time and improvement of life quality in the two groups were compared. Results The total effective rate of the observation group was significantly higher than that of the control group (92.0%vs 68.0%), the hospitalization time was significantly shorter than that of the control group [(20.3±3.4) vs (27.8±4.9)] d, all the difference was statistical (P 〈0.05). The score of life quality in the two groups after intervention increased, and the score of the observation group was obviously higher than that of the control group, with statistical difference (P〈0.05). Conclusions Evidence-based nursing intervention can significantly improve the efficacy of children with nephrotic syndrome, shorten the hospitalization time and improve their quality of life.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117