测谎结果的证据属性及运用规则探析  

On the Judicial Evidence Properties and Applicable Rules of Polygraph Test Conclusion

作　　者：柴晓宇[1] 

机构地区：[1]西北师范大学法学院,副教授法学博士兰州730070

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2015年第4期48-55,156,共8页Zhejiang Social Sciences

摘　　要：作为证据而言,测谎结果具有客观性、能证性和无限性;作为诉讼证据而言,测谎结果具有主观性、法律性和有限性。采用测谎结果认定案件事实必须以当事人合意或同意为前提,不得因一方当事人拒绝测谎而形成对其不利的心证。在民事诉讼中,必须坚持测谎结果的"有限采用规则",测谎结果只能作为间接证据帮助审查、判断其他证据,增强法官对事实认定的内心确信。在刑事侦查中,测谎结果可以作为"线索型"证据使用,作为诉讼证据使用的"证据型"运用尚需区别对待。As the evidence,the conclusion of polygraph test has objectivity,provability and infinity. As the judicial evidence,the conclusion of polygraph test has subjectivity,legality and finiteness. It should be based on the premise of the consensus of the parties to adopt the conclusion of polygraph test to ascertain the facts of a case,and the judge should not develop the unfavorable assuredness to the party who rejects the polygraph test. In the civil procedure,the ' limited admissibility rule' of the polygraph test must be followed,as indirect evidence,the conclusion of polygraph test only can be used to help to review and judge other evidences,to intensify the interior certainty of the judge on the factual determination. In the criminal investigation,the conclusion of polygraph test can be used as the ' track-oriented' evidence,the ' evidence-oriented' application of the conclusion of polygraph test must be treated discriminatively.

关 键 词：测谎结果 诉讼证据 合意 

分 类 号：D918[政治法律—法学]