合法性、策略和组织局限:国外社区组织的生发逻辑  

Legitimacy,Strategies and Organization Limits:The Growth Logic of Community Organizations Abroad

作　　者：彭兵[1] 

机构地区：[1]丽水学院民族学院

出　　处：《浙江社会科学》2015年第4期63-68,129,共7页Zhejiang Social Sciences

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"当代中国乡村社会变迁研究"(项目编号:12BSH064);浙江省高等学校中青年学科带头人学术攀登项目"瓯江流域乡村社会变迁研究"(项目编号:pd2013468);浙江省民政厅"社会机制主导的社区发展实验研究"(ZMWT201302)阶段性成果

摘　　要：在国外,社区组织被认为是社会自我发展、自我服务和自我治理的制度建设成果。由于市场化的深入推进必然给社会带来一定的创伤,国家自然成为承担社会保护责任的首选。社区组织能够向社区居民提供更符合需求的公共服务,因此逐步成长为政府服务外包的专业承担者。它挑起了市场不愿管、国家管不好的社会建设的担子,获得国家和社会领域的双重认可,并因此具备强大的政治动员力和道德优越性。然而,它也有需要完善的地方,中国在学习借鉴过程中要谨慎对待。At abroad,community organization is considered as an institutional achievement of self-development,self-service and self-governance in the society. Since the further promotion of commercialization is due to certain impacts on the society,the state becomes the first to be responsible for social protection. Community organization is able to provide the public services which are more in line with the needs of residents,so it grows to be the professional commitment for governmental service outsourcing. It takes up the missions of social development which the market is unwilling to and the state is unable to deal with,being recognized by the state and society,and obtains the capacity of political mobilization and the advantage of ethics. However,it has some shortcomings,China should treat with caution in the learning.

关 键 词：社区组织 市场化 国家干预 服务外包 路径依赖 

分 类 号：D669.3[政治法律—政治学]