检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第3期9-15,共7页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目(71273008);国家社会科学基金重点项目(13AZD012)
摘 要:城乡建设用地统一市场的构建即将全面推动,政府应当如何治理这一市场成为亟待回答的问题。对城郊和边远集体建设用地在"传统的土地征收""增减挂钩政策下的间接入市"和"假定完全自由的直接入市"三种模式下经济、生态和社会价值变化的研究发现:完全自由的土地市场实现不了改革初衷,增减挂钩政策也尚存改进空间。应以土地用途来明晰"间接入市"和"直接入市"两种模式的界限,将直接入市的土地限制在城市规划区范围内,在增减挂钩政策中要尊重农民意愿并纳入独立工矿用地。The unification of urban and rural construction land is impending,and the question how the government should regulate the market is urgent to answer.This paper systematically reviews the changes of economic,ecological and social values of suburb and exurb land under three modes which are respectively"traditional land acquisition","indirect entry in LUTRG"and"direct entry in supposed free market".It is concluded that a completely free land market can't achieve the purpose of reform,and there is still room to improve the LUTRG policy.The paper suggests to clear the boundary between"the mode of indirect entry"and"the mode of direct entry"based on land use,to limit the land which can enter the market directly within the urban planning areas,and to respect rural households' will in and incorporate independent industrial and mining land into the LUTRG policy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145