检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:夏登山[1]
出 处:《北京交通大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第2期126-131,共6页Journal of Beijing Jiaotong University(Social Sciences Edition)
基 金:国家社科基金后期资助项目"三方交际的语用学研究"(13FYY011);中国博士后科学基金第七批特别资助项目"多方交际中(不)礼貌现象的多模态研究"(2014T70050)
摘 要:传统的礼貌研究大多局限于"说话者——听者"的两方交际框架中,当前的后现代礼貌研究虽然开始关注多方语境中的面子维护和威胁行为,但受到Brown&Levinson的面子理论的影响,大多仍然在言语行为理论的基础上探讨(不)礼貌现象。对英汉语语料的分析表明,多方交际中话语角色的分配和识别也是说话者和听者实施(不)礼貌行为的交际策略。说话者可以通过显性或隐性的角色分配手段来维护或威胁听者的面子,或增强/减轻面子威胁和维护的程度,而听者可以通过识别或拒绝识别自己的话语角色来实施对说话者或其他听者的(不)礼貌行为。Traditional politeness research has largely been framed in a dyadic model of communication. Although the post - modem researchers have noticed the influence of polylogual context on face enhancing/ threatening acts, they basically follow Brown & Levinson' s face theory and study (im)politeness in the speech acts performed in the utterances. By analyzing five episodes of polylogues, this article proposes that the assignment and recognition of conversational roles can also be employed as an (ira)polite strategy in polylogual interaction. To be specific, the speaker can assign the conversational roles implicitly or explicitly to threaten or enhance the hearer(s)' face, or merely intensify or attenuate the threat and enhancement; while for a hearer in polylogual contexts, recognizing or refusing to recognize his or her role can be employed as a strategy of showing (ira)politeness to the speaker as well as the other hearers.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28