我国司法实践中侵犯隐私权案件争议问题研究  

A Research into the Disputes in Judicial Practice Concerning the Cases of Privacy Invasion in China

作　　者：王仰光[1] 

机构地区：[1]山东财经大学法学院,山东济南250014

出　　处：《梧州学院学报》2015年第1期36-42,共7页Journal of Wuzhou University

基　　金：国家社科规划一般项目(14BFXJ01)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：隐私权的范围包括私人活动、个人信息和个人领域,但个人印鉴、在逃人员登记表不属于该范围。雇员和患者隐私权的扩张是隐私权发展的一个趋势,父母子女关系是否属于隐私权应分情况对待。违反道德的隐私、不受法律保护的观点并未获得相关法律的支持。隐私不一定为真,只要向特定的第三人披露隐私即构成侵犯隐私权。侵犯隐私权的抗辩事由包括公权力部门依法行使权力、公共利益、隐私权人同意、公开判决书、权利人正当行使权利、具有优位的权利及公众人物。Privacy covers private activities, information and personal realm, but personal signatures and regitration lists for fugitives are excluded. The extension of employees＆#39; and patients＆#39; privacy is a developing trend of privacy. However, whether the relationship between parents and their children is a kind od privacy depends specific circumstances.The privacy that violates moral rules and ideas that are not protected by laws have not been supported present laws. In some cases, privacy may not be true. Only the disclosure of somebody＆#39;s privacy to a specific third party constitutes invasion of privacy. The ground of defenses of invasion of privacy includes exercising power by public authorities according to laws, public interests, consent of privacy possessors, announcement of sentences, proper performance of rights, prior rights and public figures.

关 键 词：隐私权 范围 真实事实 披露 抗辩事由 

分 类 号：D926.13[政治法律—法学]