检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]中南大学商学院
出 处:《情报学报》2015年第2期136-145,共10页Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information
基 金:国家自然科学基金青年资助项目(71103203),国家自然科学基金面上资助项目(71372061),国家自然科学基金国际合作重大项目(71210003)
摘 要:大众标注白出现以来,其发展在全球范围整体一直呈现上升趋势,但国内外对其研究存在差距。为了探寻国内外研究的具体差异,本文采集了2005—2013年国内外相关研究文献并结合实际应用,从时间趋势、期刊分布、研究框架三个方面分析了中外研究的差异。结果发现国内研究还存在诸多不足:在宏观层面,国内对大众标注的内涵机理的研究还不深入;而在中观层面,国内注重算法设计研究忽略了算法的应用;在微观层面,国内大众标注的应用站点和应用领域在深度和广度上都落后于国外。The development of Social Tagging shows a rising trend all over the world since it begins, but there are gaps between Chinese and foreign research, which raises research questions about the details of these gaps. This paper extracts all research articles about Social Tagging from 2005 to 2013 and makes a comparative analysis between Chinese and foreign research in terms of the time trend, periodical distribution and research framework of Social Tagging, based on its applications in reality. The results show that there are still many shortcomings of demestic research : At the macro level, the basic theories are not fully studies. At the meso level, Chinese focus on the algorithmic design, while foreigners pay more attention on the applications of algorithm. At the micro level, the application level of Social Tagging in China still fall behind with others in various websites and fields in the extent and depth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28