鼻滴入联合声门注入法在支气管镜中的应用效果  

Application effects of nasal drip combined with glottis infusion in bronchoscope

作　　者：麦华玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东省佛山市顺德区第一人民医院呼吸内科,广东佛山528300

出　　处：《中国当代医药》2015年第12期81-83,共3页China Modern Medicine

摘　　要：目的：探讨鼻滴入联合声门注入法在支气管镜检查中的临床效果。方法对2013年4月~2014年4月来本院诊断、治疗的80例支气管镜检查患者的相关资料进行分析，根据患者不同麻醉方法将其分为实验组和对照组，对照组采用利多卡因鼻咽部喷雾麻醉法麻醉，实验组采用鼻滴入联合声门注入法麻醉，比较两组的麻醉效果。结果实验组麻醉良好率为95.0%，高于对照组的85.0%，差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）；实验组对麻醉效果满意率为95.0%，高于对照组的65.0%，差异有统计学意义（P〈0.05）。两组手术前心率、血氧饱和度、平均动脉压差异无统计学意义（P〉0.05）。实验组并发症发生率为15.0%，高于对照组的32.5%（P〈0.05）。结论支气管镜在临床上比较常见，患者检查过程中采用鼻滴入联合声门注入法麻醉效果理想，安全、无创，不良反应较少，值得推广应用。Objective To explore the clinical effects of nasal drip combined with glottis infusion in bronchoscope. Methods 80 patients taken with bronchoscopy in our hospital from April 2013 to April 2014 were selected,and were di-vided into control group and experimental group according to the different method of anesthesia.The control group were given with anesthesia by nasopharyngeal spray of lidocalne,and the experimental group were given with anesthesia by nasal drip combined with glottis infusion.Anesthetic effect was compared between the two groups. Results The excellent rate of experimental group was 95.0%,higher than 85.0%of control group （P〈0.05）;the satisfactory rate of experimental group was 95.0%,higher than 65.0%of control group （P〈0.05）.The heart rate,oxyhemoglobin saturation and mean arteri-al pressure of experimental group between the two groups had no significant difference （P〉0.05）.The incidence of com-plication in the experimental group was 15.0%,lower than 32.5%in the control group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Bronchoscope is clinically common.The anesthetic effect of nasal drip combined with glottis infusion during examination in patients is ideal.The anesthetic method is safe,non-invasive and has fewer adverse effects,which is worthy of promotion and appli-cation.

关 键 词：鼻滴入联合声门注入法 支气管镜检查 临床效果 

分 类 号：R614[医药卫生—麻醉学]