“五四”的不同想象与思想分野——1948年“五四”文艺节中的茅盾和沈从文  

Different Imagine of May 4th and Ideological Difference

作　　者：袁洪权[1] 

机构地区：[1]西南科技大学文学与艺术学院,四川绵阳621010

出　　处：《重庆师范大学学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期63-70,共8页Journal of Chongqing Normal University Edition of Social Siences

基　　金：教育部人文社会科学青年项目<人民共和国初期文艺界的"内部清理">(11YJC751112);西南科技大学博士基金项目<新中国初期"文艺界"研究>(10zx7150);西南科技大学学繁荣哲学社会科学计划项目<四;五十年代中国的文化;传媒与社会>(13SXT016)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：1948年5月,茅盾和沈从文同时写文章表达对"五四"新文化运动的评价。仔细阅读中,我们发现:茅盾和沈从文这种评价是他们不同的"五四"想象。茅盾侧重文艺工作者的任务和五四的政治意义,显示出"毛文体""毛话语"对茅盾的潜在影响;沈从文侧重五四精神与文运的重建、五四学人与新北大人的思想探索,显示出作为思想者的沈从文的独特思考。两种不同的"五四"想象,导致他们的思想分野。1948年,是他们这种"五四"想象的最后展现。At the same time, Mao Dun and Shen Congwen wrote articles to express evaluation to the New Culture Movement of May 4th. In the course of carefully reading, we found that： the evaluation of Mao Dun and Shen Congwen was different from the May 4th Imagine. Mao Dun focused on the writer＇ s task and the po- litical significance of May 4th, showing the potential impact of ＂Chairman Mao＇ s style＂, ＂Mao discourse＂ to Mao Dun; Shen Congwen focused on the spirit and text of May 4th to the reconstruction of transportation, new Beijing University scholars who explored the idea, showed that Shen Congwen＇ s unique thinking as a thinking person＇ s. Two different kinds of May 4th imagine, resulted from the difference between their thoughts. And in 1948 was their final showing of May 4th imagine.

关 键 词：茅盾 沈从文 五四想象 思想分野 五四“文艺节” 

分 类 号：I206.6[文学—中国文学]