检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴晓薇[1] 何晓琴[1] 唐海波[1,2] 胡青竹[1] 蒲唯丹[3]
机构地区:[1]中南大学湘雅三医院临床心理科,长沙410013 [2]中南大学马克思主义学院,长沙410083 [3]中南大学湘雅二医院医学心理研究所,长沙410011
出 处:《中国临床心理学杂志》2015年第2期196-200,共5页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology
基 金:湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目一般项目"大学生积极心理品质的现状和培养研究"(项目编号:11YBA329)
摘 要:目的:探讨感觉寻求、情绪调节自我效能和攻击性的关系。方法:采用中国版大学生感觉寻求问卷、情绪调节自我效能感量表、Buss-Perry攻击性量表和攻击性内隐联想测验对400名大学生进行测评。结果:1外显攻击性与感觉寻求呈显著正相关、与情绪调节自我效能感呈显著负相关,而内隐攻击性与这两个变量相关不显著;2控制性别变量后,感觉寻求和情绪调节自我效能感均对外显攻击性有显著预测作用;3情绪调节自我效能感在感觉寻求与外显攻击性中的中介效应显著(中介效应解释总效应的10.65%),但调节效应不显著(t=-1.48,P=0.14>0.05)。结论:情绪调节自我效能感在感觉寻求与外显攻击性的关系中起中介作用。Objective: To explore the relationship among sensation seeking, regulatory emotional self-efficacy and aggression. Methods: Sensation Seeking Scale for Chinese undergraduate, Regulatory Emotional Self-efficacy Scale, BussPerry Aggression Questionnaire and Aggressiveness-Implicit Association Test were applied to 400 college students from Central South University, Changsha, China. Results: ①Explicit aggression was significantly positively correlated with sensation seeking and negatively related to regulatory emotional self-efficacy. In contrast, implicit aggression had no significantly correlation with sensation seeking and regulatory emotional self-efficacy; ②After controlling for gender, both sensation seeking and regulatory emotional self-efficacy were significantly predicted explicit aggression; ③Regulatory emotional self-efficacy was found to had a partial mediating effect on the relationship between sensation seeking and explicit aggression(the mediating effect interpreted 10.65% of total effect), but no moderating effect was observed(t=-1.48, P=0.140.05).Conclusion: Regulatory emotional self-efficacy was a mediator between sensation seeking and explicit aggression.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38