大学新生学校适应与成人依恋的关系  

Relationship between Adult Attachment and School Adjustment of College Freshmen

作　　者：谢安娜[1] 杨蕴萍[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学附属北京安定医院/临床心理学系,精神疾病诊断与治疗北京市重点实验室,北京100088

出　　处：《中国临床心理学杂志》2015年第2期339-342,共4页Chinese Journal of Clinical Psychology

摘　　要：目的:探讨大学新生学校适应性与成人依恋之间的关系,同时探索人口学特征对此关系的影响。方法:采用中国大学生适应量表、亲密关系体验问卷修订版与自编一般情况调查表对北京950名本科新生(其中有效被试874人)进行调查。结果:1安全型依恋个体占总体的46.1%,迷恋型占34.9%,淡漠型占12.2%,恐惧型占6.8%;2在人际关系、校园生活、情绪及总体适应维度上,城市新生显著高于农村新生;3相对于非独生子女,独生子女的自我适应较好,而依恋回避程度较低;4安全型依恋的学校适应显著优于三种不安全型依恋;5依恋焦虑和回避负向预测学校适应。结论:安全型依恋个体的学校适应性最好,依恋高焦虑和依恋高回避不利于良好学校适应的发展,且依恋与学校适应两者关系同人口学背景存在一定联系。Objective： To discuss the relationship between adult attachment and school adjustment in college freshmen.Methods： 950 college freshmen in Beijing（of which 874 were available） were randomly selected and assessed with the ECR-R and CCSAS. Results： ①The attachment style distribution of the participants was as follows： Secure（46.1%）, Preoccupied（34.9%）, Dismissing（12.2%）, Fearful（6.8%）; ②In terms of the interpersonal relationship, campus life, emotion and the overall, urban freshmen got better adjustment than rural ones; ③Compared to the non-only-child participants, onlychild participants got higher scores in self-adjustment, but lower scores in attachment avoidance; ④The college freshmen of secure attachment style had better school adjustment than those of insecure attachment style; 5Attachment anxiety and avoidance were negative predictors of the school adjustment. Conclusion： The college freshmen of secure adult attachment style present the best school adjustment, and the relationship between attachment and school adjustment may be moderated by the demographic background.

关 键 词：大学新生 成人依恋 学校适应 人口学特征 

分 类 号：R395.6[哲学宗教—心理学]