检察机关当事人化的理论障碍分析  

Analysis of Theoretical Obstacles of the Prosecutions as Litigants

作　　者：戴鹏[1] 

机构地区：[1]广东警官学院法律系,广东广州510232

出　　处：《江汉大学学报（社会科学版）》2015年第2期39-45,123,共7页Journal of Jianghan University(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：检察机关当事人化主张将检察机关从法律监督机关还原为承担控诉职能的一方当事人。客观公正是为平衡控辩力量悬殊而对检察机关行使控诉职能的必要限制,与法律监督职能无关;我国检察机关基于法律监督权而享有的诉讼权力绝大部分也是控诉方当事人应该享有的权力,部分仅以法律监督权为基础的权力与诉讼规律不符,应予调整;司法公正的基础在于通过控辩平等对抗而制约审判权,无需借助该诉讼结构之外的法律监督权。The idea of prosecutions as litigants asserts that the prosecutions are reconstructed from their functions as legal supervising organs to functions as litigants. Objectivity and fairness are necessary restrictions on prosecutions' accusation functions in order to balance the disparity of strengths between the prosecuting and defending parties;they have no relevance to legal supervising functions. In China,the litigious right that the prosecuting organs have based on their legal supervising right is mostly the right the litigants should have,part of which does not conform to the norms of litigation and should be adjusted. The foundation of judicial justice is sustained by containing jurisdiction through confrontations of the prosecuting and defending parties on an equal basis,without the help of the legal supervision outside the litigation structure.

关 键 词：检察机关 诉讼结构 法律监督 当事人 客观公正 

分 类 号：D916.3[政治法律—法学]