检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈昆玉[1]
出 处:《管理工程学报》2015年第2期10-18,共9页Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目-地区科学基金资助项目(70862005);云南省哲学社会科学规划课题资助项目(YB201129);"云南省资源型产业升级与产业结构战略性调整"创新团队项目
摘 要:在"创新型国家"建设的背景下,资金瓶颈被认为是企业自主创新的一个主要影响因素,相应资本结构的变化也可能影响了企业的成长。以592家中国A股上市公司为样本,以2001-2010年共10年为时间窗,利用独立混合横截面回归方法研究了自主创新能力对融资行为的影响,以及财务杠杆对企业成长的影响。结果发现:无论是用专利授权数还是专利申请数作为创新能力的替代变量,创新能力对内源融资都具有显著的促进作用,用专利申请数作为创新能力的替代变量时,创新能力对股权融资也具有显著促进作用。进而,创新能力对杠杆具有显著的抑制作用。但并未发现杠杆影响成长的证据。In recent years, Chinese government decided to construct 'Innovation-orientated Country'. A tremendous amount of resources is devoted to developing technological innovation and to securing patent protection over them. Patenting activity literally exploded in China over the past 5 years. Firms have become as the subject of innovation activity. During the innovation activity, however, there are existing two questions. First, how does technological innovation affect a firm's financing choices? Second, how does capital structure affect a firm's growth? Such two questions have caught the attention of academics and practitioners alike. In this paper, I use the patent data to assess empirically the implications of independent innovation for corporate financing and growth. First, I apply existing theory to discuss these two questions respectively. There are two competing theories to expect the first question. On the one hand, innovations may signal strong investment opportunities and therefore require new equity finance to avoid debt overhang problems (Myers, 1977). As a consequence, outsider investors may want more control rights. Alternatively, technological innovations may call for more financial slack, for two different reasons. First, patents may come with a reduction of information asymmetry. As a result, equity goes up in the pecking order of external financing (Myers and Majluf, 1984). Second, technological innovations may negatively affect a firm's competitive position and therefore call for more financial slack to survive against deep-pocket rivals. On the other hand, technological innovation may imply strong investment opportunities and therefore will require outside debt finance. Or technological innovation may create over capacity, and determine the need to restructure or exit. I apply these theories to discuss Chinese firms and develop three hypothesizes. There are also two competing theories to expect the last question. High leverage may negatively affect a firm's growth because t
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112