检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨忠直[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学安泰经济与管理学院,上海200052
出 处:《上海交通大学学报》2015年第4期543-549,共7页Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University
基 金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(70573070)
摘 要:利用财富价值最大化为目标函数建立了产权协商交易定价模型,并在导出的求解产权均衡价格的加权边际效用零和方程的基础上,依据在产权拍卖方的偏好与效用函数的结构给定的条件下多个竞标人的偏好与效用函数结构的差异和竞标人的预期价值与保留价格的差异等因素,运用产权拍卖方与多个竞标人的加权边际效用零和方程来决定产权招标投标和产权升价拍卖(或降价拍卖)的中标价格.以最高(或最低)均衡价格为中标价格的Pareto最优为基准,分析了竞标人最高可接受的中标价格和以拍卖方的交易底价为中标价格的财富价值损失和效率损失,解释了财富价值最大化的产权公允交易的经济学意义.English auction and Dutch auction of the property were obtained based on the zero-sum equation of weighted marginal utility to solve equilibrium price of the property deduced by a pricing model of negoti- ating transaction of the property right which can maximize wealth value, and by considering the differences between preference and utility function and the differences between the bidding reservation prices and the expected value to the object among different bidders where the preference and utility function of the auctioneer are given and the winning prices in competitive bidding. By comparing the winning price which is the highest equilibrium price in the sense of Pareto optimality, the loss of wealth and inefficiency in two situations were analyzed, one taking the highest value accepted by the bidder as the winning price, the oth- er taking the reservation price of the auctioneer as the winning price. Finally, an economic explanation for the fair transaction maximization of the value of the property right was given.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49