赵尔丰、张荫棠因《中英藏印通商章程》而起的一场争论  

An Argument about Regulation on Tibet-India Trade between Great Britain and China in 1908

作　　者：康欣平[1] 

机构地区：[1]西藏民族学院民族研究院,陕西咸阳712082

出　　处：《西藏民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版）》2015年第2期9-14,24,共7页Journal of Tibet Nationalities Institute(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金西部项目"清廷筹治西藏思路及措施的演变研究(1887-1911)"(项目号:12XZS028);西藏民族学院"青年学人培育计划"项目(项目号:12my QP01)的阶段性成果

摘　　要：光绪三十四年(1908)三月二十日,张荫棠以大清国钦差全权大臣、西藏查办事件大臣身份,与英国代表韦礼敦拟订《中英藏印通商章程》。《章程》全文在当时报章一经刊登,即引发时被任命驻藏办事大臣的赵尔丰的异议。本文主要梳理了赵尔丰、张荫棠关于《中英藏印通商章程》的争论及清廷对争论的裁决。赵尔丰与张荫棠当时所处位置不同,他们思考问题的出发点不同,赵尔丰由于过去的"事功"显得进取与强硬,而张荫棠处在外交谈判位置"妥协"恐难免。《章程》整个谈判过程是张荫棠与外务部不断协商并在其领导下进行的,外务部清楚谈判过程的艰难与反复,故指出赵尔丰"陈议虽高而于事局不无隔膜",清廷最高统治者最终也同意了外务部观点及处理方案。As imperial envoy of Great Qing Dynasty and secretary investigator of Tibet, Zhang Yintangdrew up Regulation on Tibet- India Trade between Great Britain and China with British delegate Wilton OnMarch 20 th in 1908. The published regulation had sparked dissent of Tibet official Zhao Erfeng. This papermainly presents an argument about Regulation on Tibet- India Trade between Great Britain and China and Qinggovernment's adjudication. As Zhao Erfeng and Zhang Yintang were in different positions and considered fromdifferent perspectives, Zhao Erfeng tended to be more aggressive because of his past'achievement'; however,Zhang Yintang was easier to make a compromise in diplomatic negotiations. Zhang Yintang was in charge of thewhole negotiation. Through the continuous negotiation with ministry of foreign affairs, they were clear about howdifficult and repeatedly the process was. Therefore, it pointed out that Zhao Erfeng'has excellent ideas but doesnot know the whole circumstances'. At last, the emperor of Qing Dynasty agreed with the view of ministry of for-eign affairs and their processing scheme.

关 键 词：赵尔丰 张荫棠 《中英藏印通商章程》 

分 类 号：K25[历史地理—历史学]