检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学廉政研究中心,江西南昌330031 [2]南昌大学公共管理学院,江西南昌330031
出 处:《廉政文化研究》2015年第2期41-52,共12页Anti-corruption and Integrity Culture Studies
基 金:国家社科基金一般项目(13BGL120);江西省高校哲学社会科学研究重点招标课题(ZD12)
摘 要:基于新制度主义中的制度性同形理论,通过对117个高校腐败案例进行分析,发现高校腐败最大的特征就是与政府腐败特点的一致性,无论是在腐败主体特征还是腐败行为特征方面都极为相似。研究表明:在高等教育场域中,在强制性同形和模仿性同形机制作用下,高等教育场域中的高校与政府呈现组织性趋同现象,两者的组织结构、治理机制、监督漏洞、官场文化等方面都具有同形性,两者都采取相对集权的治理结构,而监督制衡机制效果不彰,无法有效地约束和限制权力,从而使高校腐败特征与政府腐败特征表现一致。从这个特点上来说,高校现有的治理结构和权力机制并没有体现出高校应有的独特性,其权力的运行机制也不足以控制腐败的发生。Based on the institutional homomorphism theory of new institutionalism and by analyzing 117 corruption cases in universities, we find that the most distinctive feature of corruption in universities is the consistency with that in governments. The research shows that under the effect of the mandatory homomorphism and imitative homomorphism mechanisms, the organizational convergence appears in both universities and governments in higher education field, where homomorphism exists in their organization structure, governance institutions, supervision loophole, and bureaucratic culture. Both of them adopt relatively power-concentrated governance structure while the effect of the supervisory institution is not satisfying. The abuse of power can not be effectively restrained and restricted. Therefore, the features of the corruption in universities and that of corruption in governments share many similarities. In light of this feature, the existing governance structure and power mechanism of universities do not present their due uniqueness, and its power mechanism is deficient and unable to prevent the corruption.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.191.132.105