检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《佳木斯大学社会科学学报》2015年第2期47-50,共4页Journal of Social Science of Jiamusi University
基 金:天津市哲学社会科学规划项目:"中国古代法官制度研究"(Tjfx08-047)
摘 要:"司法附属行政"是中国古代司法的一个重要特征。在这一背景下,中国古代法官地位就呈现出鲜明的附属性特征,这种特征同样体现在法院的地位和司法权的地位上,这也导致中国古代法官没有专门的职业保障制度,而这一切都深深地镶嵌在当时的人治大背景之中。通过与现代法官地位的比较,可以更加深切地感受到古今法官地位以至整个司法状况的巨大差异。中国现代法官地位在独立性方面相对于古代法官有了巨大改善,但仍然不尽如人意,还需要在今后的司法改革中进行反思和重点关注。“Judicature affilitated to administration”is an important feature of the ancient Chinese judicature ,in which background ,the ancient Chinese judge’s status presented the distinct feature of the subjunctive ,and this feature also em-bodied in the status of courts and the judicial power .This also brought about that there was no specific professional security system of judges in ancient China .All were deeply embedded in the background of the rule of man .By comparation with the modern judge’s status ,we can more deeply feel the vast difference between the ancient and modern judge’s status ,as well as the whole judicial position .In terms of independence ,relative to the ancient judge ,modern judge’s position has been a huge improvement ,but still not perfect ,which shall be reflected and focused on in the judicial reform in the future .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49