法律推理中法律事实与法律规范的链接研究  

Research on the Link of Legal Facts and Legal Norms in Legal Reasoning

作　　者：印大双[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京森林警察学院,江苏南京210023

出　　处：《贵州警官职业学院学报》2015年第2期101-106,共6页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College

摘　　要：法官在循环往复的思维考察过程中,既需要借助于实务经验,也需要运用法律推理技术,这种往返流转过程必须以客观的法律事实与实体法上的法律规范为依据和前提来进行。法律推理所关心的重要问题表现为由法律文本所体现的规范层面转向法律施行的实践层面,并且根据法律目的将规范适用于特定法律事实。判断一个法律事实是否符合法定的构成要件始终不是简单通过逻辑推论的涵摄就能实现的,法官在此过程中必须寻求最密切联系规则,使得法律事实与法律规范之间形成有效的链接,用法律方法论确立法律推理的前提,以便解决判决的合法性问题,由此确立法律推理对法治的建设性意义。In the thinking process in endless circles, a judge needs the help of practical experience as well as the application of legal reasoning technology. This ongoing process must be based on objective legal facts and legal norms of substantive law. A priority of legal reasoning lies in the diversion from the normative regulations in legal text to the law enforcement in practice, and applying the norms to the specific legal facts in accordance with the law. The process of judging whether a legal fact conforms to statutory requirement couldn＇t always be achieved by means of simple subsumtion of logical deduction, so a judge must seek the closest connection rules in the thinking process, form effective link between legal facts and legal norms and establish the premise to legal reasoning with legal methodology. These attempts may solve the problem of legitimacy of judgment, thus establishing the constructive significance of legal reasoning in the rule of law.

关 键 词：法律推理 法律事实 法律规范 

分 类 号：D90-051[政治法律—法学理论]