检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵军[1]
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《河南警察学院学报》2015年第2期58-64,共7页Journal of Henan Police College
摘 要:梳理2012—2014年若干典型国企企业家犯罪案件可见,国企贪腐案件体系性特征突出,危害后果放大效应明显;国企及其负责人对政治权力具有很强的依附性,这种依附对国企企业家自身的刑事风险具有促成效应;国企企业家因其特殊身份易于成为某一行业或地区权贵结盟的关键节点,其刑事法律风险具有较强的辐射效应;隐蔽、复杂贪腐手法的介入增强了某些国企企业家实施犯罪的信心,这导致他们在自身刑事法律风险判断上的鸵鸟效应;国有企业在某些领域的垄断及优势地位为企业带来了巨额利润,也为国企企业家实施各种贪腐犯罪提供了"条件"与"理由"。A number of typical SOE Entrepreneurs' Criminal cases from 2012 to 2014 reveal that SOE Entre- preneurs' Crime is of amplification effect. State - owned enterprises and those who are responsible for running them have to attach themselves to political authority, which promotes SOE entrepreneurs' criminal legal risk. Because of their special status, SOE entrepreneurs tend to be the alliance of the wealthy and the powerful. Therefore, SOE en- trepreneurs' criminal legal risk is of some kind of radiation effect. Some hidden criminal means have made it hard for judicial organs to investigate and combat corruption encourage SOE entrepreneur' s crime. State - owned enter- prises' monopoly and other kinds of advantages result in huge profits which provide SOE entrepreneurs with condi- tions and excuses for corruption.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.40